Home
About Us
Concepts
Research
History Education Scholars
Leading experts in the field
Published Research
Peer-reviewed articles & studies
Civics Education
Democratic institutions & engagement
Blog Posts
Analysis & commentary
Critiques of Textbooks
How textbooks shape history
Controversial History
Complex figures & events
Interviews
Lesson Plans
Issues in History
Sample Module
Story Reader
Books
The Payday Empire
Profit, Power, and Politics of Exploitation
Mia & Max and the Smoke Brothers
A children's read-aloud story
Adult Civics
Civics Compact
Community
Sign In
Media
Investigative Journalists
Holding power accountable
Bad Faith Actors
Misinformation & propaganda
Documentaries
Essential civic education films
ACT Prep
Contact Us
Donate
Editing primary source
Title
Author
Year
Era
Source type
Description
Volume II examines the President's own conduct - the firing of FBI Director James Comey, pressure on the attorney general, and other acts - and whether it amounted to obstruction of justice.
Excerpt
"Because we determined not to make a traditional prosecutorial judgment, we did not draw ultimate conclusions about the President's conduct. ... [I]f we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President clearly did not commit obstruction of justice, we would so state. Based on the facts and the applicable legal standards, however, we are unable to reach that judgment. Accordingly, while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him."
Significance
The single most quoted passage of the investigation, and the one most often quoted with its reasoning removed. The special counsel explains that he was not applying ordinary prosecutorial judgment at all. That distinction is the whole lesson: a decision not to decide is still a decision, and it has a reason.
Featured
Show this primary source
Back to primary sources
