Critiques of Textbooks

Examining how textbook narratives shape our understanding of history — and what gets left out.

Textbooks are the backbone of history education, but they are not neutral documents. Every textbook reflects choices about what to include, what to omit, and how to frame events. This section examines those choices — highlighting scholarship that critiques textbook narratives and offers alternative perspectives for educators and students.

Featured Research

Textbook Analysis

Kason Kendall — Utah State University

Analyzing the Portrayal of the Atomic Bombs Dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in Textbooks and Non-Profit Curriculum Sources

Published in The Oregon Journal of the Social Studies, this study examines how U.S. history textbooks and non-profit curriculum sources portray the atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Kendall finds that textbook narratives often frame the bombings through a nationalist lens that emphasizes American justification while minimizing Japanese suffering and downplaying ongoing historical debate about the decision to use nuclear weapons.

Textbook Analysis World War II Nuclear History Curriculum Critique
Read the Full Article

Peer-Reviewed

Standards & Textbooks

Kason Kendall & Robby Freetly — 2026

Weapons of Mass Destruction in the Curriculum: Textbook Narratives and Georgia's Standards of Excellence

Published in Teaching Social Studies in the Peach State, this study examines how WMDs and the 2003 invasion of Iraq appear in Georgia's social studies standards and in two widely used U.S. history textbooks. The authors find that the textbooks stress the WMD case for invasion while saying much less about the fact that no stockpiles were ever found — and they propose three approaches teachers can use when a claim like this is still contested.

Textbook Analysis Iraq War Curriculum Standards Media Literacy
Read our summary & the full article

Comparative Study

U.S. & Chinese Textbooks

Chenyu Li & Kason Kendall

Teaching Empire: A Comparative Analysis of U.S. and Chinese History Textbooks on 20th-Century U.S. Imperialism

This study compares how U.S. and Chinese high school history textbooks portray 20th-century U.S. imperialism. Li and Kendall find that textbooks in both countries serve national narratives — American textbooks downplay imperialist ambitions while framing U.S. actions as spreading democracy, while Chinese textbooks emphasize American expansionism as a form of hegemony. The article reveals how national identity shapes textbook narratives on both sides and argues for more transnational approaches to teaching imperialism.

Comparative Analysis U.S. Imperialism Chinese Textbooks National Narratives
Read the Full Article

Why Textbook Critiques Matter

Missing Perspectives

Textbooks often center American or Western viewpoints, leaving out the voices and experiences of those most affected by U.S. actions abroad.

Simplified Narratives

Complex historical events are often reduced to tidy stories that minimize controversy and eliminate nuance.

Better Teaching

Understanding textbook biases helps educators teach more complete, critical history that prepares students for informed citizenship.

More Critiques Coming Soon

We are building a library of textbook critiques covering topics from Reconstruction to the Cold War, immigration to environmental history. If you have research to contribute, get in touch.